Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Civilization VS Nature

Politics, economy, nature environment, nature resources, culture, religions, technology.

All these and many more are what's that revolving within our planet earth in these days.

With the power of connections through the world wide web, exchanges of information has surely went faster than we could have ever imagined, and have surged the world to work somewhat differently than what it once used to be.

All these, the earth civilization, has gone a long long way since the dawn of man.
However, it would seems that as civilization move forward, nature has taken its tool and further decay from what was once a planet full of greens to a world now overclouded by mega skyscrapers, and all the refuses that man create in their forwarding movement in civilization.

With this, does Sir Charles Darwin's definition on evolution-nature selection still works?
Since we wouldn't know if civilization is actually nature selection itself, but through out the past century, there had been numerous findings on new species of life form constantly being discovered, and some species like the Panda, Tigers, and other species that are constantly decreasing at a painstaking rate, being added into the list of endangered species.

Is this nature selection that causes the species to slowly diminished?
or is it because of reasons like human's act, but is that nature selection?or was it the other way round?

(just me wondering, since i've read a punchline which is something like "Mankind took a step forward, and nature is left behind.")

No comments:

Post a Comment